"This must come to an end"

First, advertising told women to be more beautiful, slimmer, younger. Then it tried to sell them inauthentic "fempowerment." Enough is enough, say bestselling authors Jane Cunningham and Philippa Roberts.

Fempowerment
Too few companies still look through the "female lens." (Illustration: Loreto Manzanera)

m&kWith "Brandsplaining" you wrote a bestseller about the - often problematic - image of women in marketing and advertising. Why was the time ripe for your book?

Philippa Roberts: Over the past fifteen years, we have conducted surveys with female subjects almost every week as part of our professional work. This has been enormously fascinating because so much has happened in the female lifeworld during that time: The rise of "Fourth Wave" feminism, social media developments, progress, the fight for women's representation in politics, #MeToo ... all of these things have created the impression in the marketing and advertising community that we can leave many of the problems of the past behind. That we should move on to other issues. But that's just the inside view, and it's in direct contradiction to what we heard from female subjects in our research. So there seems to be a gap between what the industry thinks and what the target audience thinks. And we felt it was high time to investigate this gap.How did the women you spoke with feel about marketing and advertising?Jane Cunningham: For example, we conducted a comprehensive study with more than 14,000 female participants in fourteen countries and asked them what they thought about marketing and advertising in general. The answers were very similar in all countries and age groups: The vast majority of women said that they were unable to recognize themselves in most current advertising messages; they felt that some of the stereotypes shown there were even harmful. And the subjects also expressed that the portrayal of women in advertising was often far too narrow; there were too many thin women, not enough older women.But you didn't limit yourself to quantitative surveys, but also analyzed other data?Cunningham: Yes, we did a content analysis where we looked at 120 advertising campaigns that targeted women in the US, UK and Australia. In each of those campaigns, we looked closely at what's happening in the plot structure; how the women are portrayed. What do they look like? Are they "traditionally attractive?" What about diversity? How often are women presented in a stereotypical role, in a domestic setting, how often do they show a put-on laugh? How often are they sexualized? We quickly realized: there are still a lot of images and ideas in advertising that conform to the old ideas of what women "are" or what they should be. More subtle than before, perhaps, but still there.Can you elaborate on this subtlety?Cunningham: There is probably no brand left that says in its advertising - and I'm deliberately putting this in bold terms now - "Oh my God, look how wrinkled and old you've become!" But now people are talking about "dignity in old age" and about the fact that as few wrinkles as possible give older ladies precisely this dignity. Which is essentially the same thing (laughs). If at all women are shown who are older than fifty, which is an absolute rarity! Or the advertising is about "wellness" and "clean eating," but what is actually meant are the same rigorous diets as in the past.

 

The harmful narratives remain, only you recognize them at second or third glance.

Roberts: Exactly. In our book, we refer to this as "sneaky sexism." Another example of the same would be the use of symbols or color codes that predate modern discourses of equality. Whereas packaging used to say "For Him" or "For Her," companies now simply use the softer, gentler, weaker colors for women. And more floral decorations. Men's packaging, on the other hand, features the dark, bold, striking colors. Sporty patterns, typography that signals movement and strength. The same thing is communicated as before, just in subtext.

 

 

Where does this basic tenor in marketing and advertising - which you mentioned earlier - come from, which demands that women constantly work on themselves, constantly "improve" themselves?

Roberts: The roots of this lie deep in our social and cultural history. Throughout the millennia, women have actually always had a secondary status socially; this implied that they had to behave and present themselves in such a way that they were pleasing to men. Their job was merely to secure male approval. And, you know - we as a modern society like to talk about how much has been done in terms of equality in politics and in business. But the reality is that the vast majority of CEOs are still men, and the vast majority of heads of state are also men. The reality is that men still hold the power in many places; alone bear the responsibility. Consequently, women are still often expected to behave in ways that do not upset the powerful.

 

... which is reflected in the ideals conveyed by marketing and advertising ...

Roberts: Yes, little girls should be cute and sweet, take care of animals and dolls, find everything nice that is pink or pastel, while little boys are allowed to experience adventures. It doesn't matter if they get dirty, if they are bullies. Girls, on the other hand, are permanently and practically from the beginning of their lives exposed to messages that they have to look better, "be" better; they are totally reduced to their appearance.

Cunningham: The latter, by the way, is something that gets worse when the girls become young women. Do you remember the Victoria's Secret fashion shows? There used to be these very young models who were all over the media - talking about how much weight they had lost, how much exercise they did to get even thinner, they had hair extensions done, et cetera. Then they got on the catwalk wearing huge wings. They were angels, portraying a cliché that said, "I'm here to be as beautiful and as appealing as possible - not to myself, but to the male eye." And of course, the prettiest, slimmest, bustiest angel got to wear the white wedding lingerie at the end of the show. The message was, "Make an effort and optimize yourself, then with luck you may get married someday!" (laughs)

Roberts: Mothers, too, are constantly suggested that they have to be perfect, which in turn implies that they fail if they're not ... if they're not happy about being a mother one hundred percent of the time. And older women, we've talked about this before, just disappear from the scene because they're no longer ... "useful" when viewed through a male lens. You know, it's not just in marketing, it's a cultural problem in general that these ideas about women are still being conveyed. But while we're finally seeing progress in film, music, and television programming, marketing and advertising are really lagging behind.

"The prettiest, slimmest angel gets to wear the wedding lingerie at the end. The message: if you make an effort, you might find a husband someday."

 

Do you have any idea why that is? In general, after all, marketing and advertising professionals see themselves as people who not only recognize trends, but actually set them ...

Roberts: One of the very immediate reasons is certainly that the creative departments in agencies are still largely staffed and run by men. I don't know about you in Switzerland, but here in London, about two-thirds of the people who work in creative departments and create campaigns are men. And also a certain kind of men: quite young, usually white, usually more urban socialized. The culture there is often this "Hey, bro!", this emphatically casual display of masculinity. These creatives tend to care more about a good punchline than about really and deeply understanding their audience. Fittingly, there's also a big pay gap of about thirty percent between male and female employees in the agencies - which is pretty hypocritical, since the agencies are selling empowerment communications but not living up to their own standards at all.

(Illustration: Loreto Manzanera)

You talked earlier about the data you've collected. Agencies and marketing departments tell me all the time that they, too, make their decisions based on data. But if they really did that, they would have to treat female audiences differently, right?

Cunningham: Well, the relevant agencies and big companies collect a lot of data, yes. But when they do market research themselves, they often ask the wrong questions. They go to a group of women and say, "Would you like bullshit innovation number one or bullshit innovation number two?" And even though neither option is really attractive to the focus group, the women are likely to answer, "If we have to choose, we'll just choose number two." And the company concludes, "Great, we evaluated that, they think number two is great." But what wasn't asked is, "How do you feel about our bullshit in principle?" There, the answer would probably have been quite different (laughs).

 

What should change here?

Cunningham: It should become standard practice to ask women openly and honestly for their opinions. For example, "What don't you like about the way this brand addresses you?" Or, "Which of your needs are not being met by this product?" Again, yes, there's plenty of data to go around. Yes, there's a lot of research being done. But how much of it is real listening, how much of it is an effort to have a real dialogue? The kind of dialogue where companies are totally open to the answers they get? In our consulting work, we've heard over and over again from clients, "Yeah, we talked to a focus group, but they just said the things that women just always say." Well, if they say something over and over again, maybe they mean it! (laughs) How absurd to use that as an argument for not giving meaning to a statement, right?

Roberts: Sometimes there's also this sexist undertone where marketing or advertising executives say, "Oh, I'm not going to let six housewives interviewed somewhere tell me what my advertising should look like ..." To these guys, it may sound plausible and tough in a meeting, but in reality it's very demeaning, condescending and ensures that important messages are not heard.

"The reality is that men still hold the power in many places; are solely in charge."

 

And they need to be heard, you say, even if they are inconvenient for companies.

Roberts: Of course, it is never easy for a company to hear that its female customers are dissatisfied; of course, it is difficult to face up to uncomfortable truths. Especially when the insights gained mean that you have to change a lot. But we always say that change is coming anyway - the "tipping point" is here, marketing and advertising must finally take this fact into account. We are in the midst of a massive cultural shift because women are better educated than ever before. Because through social media, which otherwise definitely has its drawbacks, female voices - and voices that deviate from the mainstream - are being heard.

Cunningham: Women cannot and will not be silenced any longer. So the time is ripe for better marketing, better advertising. Hence our book, which carries an important message: If brands and companies are serious about appealing to women, attracting female customers and retaining the female customers they have, they need to move. Immediately. We are witnessing the dawn of real, authentic "empowerment" - as opposed to the superficial narratives that have circulated over the past few years.

"Women can't and won't be silenced anymore. So the time is ripe for better marketing, better advertising."

 

You would have to explain that to me again in detail, please.

Roberts: The false, superficial "fempowerment" narrative has continued to suggest to women that they should change, but targeted their inner attitudes in the process. Brands used to proclaim messages like, "You need to optimize your looks." Then they moved to saying, "You need to optimize how you act, think and feel." Women are supposed to be career-driven, fearless. Bold. "Strong is the new beautiful." "Fempowerment" understood in this way has no interest in eliminating the system and the stubborn remnants of patriarchy, but continues to locate all the responsibility on women. And actually, that's exactly what needs to stop.

The bestseller "Brandsplaining" by Jane Cunningham and Philippa Roberts. (Image: zVg.)

Entrepreneurs may wonder what will happen to their sales if they can no longer claim that their products are necessary for a better life.

Cunningham: There's nothing wrong with meeting needs, is there? There is absolutely nothing wrong with satisfying needs and asking women what they want in order to then develop helpful products and services. What is wrong, however, is this hyper-critical view of women that says, "There's something wrong with you. We're going to make you feel like there's something wrong with you. So that you think you need a remedy for it. And then we will sell you that remedy. Therein lies the great cynicism.

 

What can men - in marketing and advertising, but also beyond - do to help drive positive change?

Roberts: I think the most important thing is first to become aware of problematic narratives. This age-old idea of a "woman who must please" is so firmly etched into the collective consciousness that it still influences how audiences are segmented, categories are codified, communications are produced, and proposals are written. Men need to understand this and be attentive and critical from it. Fortunately, this is where knowledge makes a difference: once you start to deal with it, it's virtually impossible to return to a state of ignorance.


Jane Cunningham and Philippa Roberts are founders and managing directors of the Consultancy "Pretty Little Head, which advises companies on marketing to female audiences. As part of their work, they have authored several international studies and three books. Previously, they worked in the agency industry, for example at DDB and Ogilvy.

More articles on the topic